Skepticism can be lethal. Peter Singer

United in Opposition

The Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists stands for a different kind of Europe. We believe that Europe would be more prosperous and democratic if each nation provided for its own needs.

The gap between people and politicians on the issue of Europe has never been wider. Large majorities in every member state now want powers to be returned from Brussels to the national capital. According to an opinion poll published in March, the number of people who want more European integration has fallen to 16 per cent in France, 12 per cent in Germany, and 5 per cent each in Sweden and the United Kingdom.

An unreconstructed paleo-federalism

Yet closer integration remains the aim of all the main pan-European parties standing for election in May. This year, for the first time, they have been invited to nominate candidates for the presidency of the European Commission, as though the EU were already a federal state. The three main candidates have interchangeable views. Jean-Claude Juncker for the Christian Democrats, Guy Verhofstadt for the Liberals and Martin Schulz for the Socialists all favor a United States of Europe. All want tax harmonization, a single European military force, a united diplomatic corps, a federal police force and all the other accoutrements of single statehood.

This is the unreconstructed paleo-federalism of the 1950s, which takes no account of how the world has moved on, nor of how public opinion has turned against centralization. All three candidates come from EU founder members. Indeed, all three come from within a few miles of each other, in the heartland of Charles the Great which produced the original EU leaders.

Being opposed to a federal Europe

Who, then, will speak for all those millions of Europeans who have never asked to be citizens of a federal state? We will. The Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists believes in a Europe of nations. We recognize that people’s primary loyalty is to their national institutions and, instead of centralizing more powers in Brussels, we want to take decisions closer to the people they affect. We are the youngest of the main European political parties, bringing together 18 mainstream center-right national parties of which six are presently in office. We believe in sound money, personal responsibility, free competition, trade liberalization, low taxes, strong families, national sovereignty and the devolution of power.

Being opposed to a federal Europe, we have not proposed a candidate for the Commission presidency. We believe that the process lacks a proper legal basis. The Treaty of Lisbon contains one sentence saying that the national governments should take account of the European elections when proposing the President, which the integrationist parties have chosen to interpret as meaning that, in effect, a federal Europe already exists, with pan-European parties contesting the election on common and binding manifestos. In any case, the whole idea lacks public support. Try to imagine a voter in Lisbon or Leipzig or Liverpool saying “I was planning to vote for Juncker, but this Verhofstadt fellow really impresses me”. The federalists are building a government where there is no nation, no shared public opinion.

Democracy requires a demos

Democracy requires a demos: a unit with which we identify when we use the word “we”. That exists at national levels but – except for a tiny number of Brussels functionaries – it doesn’t exist at the European level. When you take the demos out of democracy, you are left only with the kratos: with the power of a state that must compel by law what it dare not ask in the name of civic engagement.

AECR stands for a different kind of Europe. We believe that the EU has responded to the euro crisis by accelerating the policies that caused it in the first place: more integration, more borrowing, more government intervention. We believe that Europe would be more prosperous, as well as more democratic, if each nation were free to fit its economic policy to its own needs. We want to ensure that the flow of powers between Brussels and the national capitals can happen both ways. We believe, in short, in a Europe of free peoples, free nations and free markets. We may be in a small minority in Brussels — but not, we hope, among the national electorates.

This article originally appeared on The European’s European Elections Special website. For more articles visit: http://en.theeuropean.eu

Read more in this debate: Max Tholl, Daan Welling, Dessislava Kirova .

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

Related Content: Tories, European-union, United-kingdom

Debate

Great Britain and the Brexit

Medium_24a6552adc
0

Has UK Politics hit fast forward?

Just over a week ago the UK’s latest Prime Minister was revealed. The leadership contest, sparked by the country’s vote to leave the EU and expected to last weeks, was over in just days. Is this a reflection of the UK’s political environment post... read more

Medium_5c12a6997c
by Matthew Amroliwala
24.07.2016

Debate

Britian and the undemocratic elements of the EU

Medium_a778943e6d
0

With or without them

The UK is not an obstacle to harmony and stability. It is the EU integrationists who generate economic and democratic instability. read more

Medium_c528787f60
by Bill Cash
18.03.2015

Column

Medium_e2d4358a72
by Mark Briggs
24.11.2014
Most Read